All

Chapters

Economic

Goods

Economic

Subjects

Market

Mechanisms

Produktions-

prozesse

Thread

Scan the QR-Code

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

This paper says that large language models like GPT-3 can potentially be used as surrogates for human respondents in social science research.

This is an intriguing idea... 🤔

Out of One, Many

Taylor

@DataDiva

But how exactly would that work? 🤷‍♀️

Taylor

@DataDiva

But how exactly would that work? 🤷‍♀️

Morgan

@InsightGuru

It seems the authors propose conditioning the language model on specific socio-demographic profiles or 'backstories' to make it generate outputs capturing the attitudes and perspectives associated with those profiles. 📊

Taylor

@DataDiva

But how exactly would that work? 🤷‍♀️

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

By providing rich demographic context in the conditioning prompts, the model can theoretically tap into the distinct subdistributions of language corresponding to different population segments. 🌐

Taylor

@DataDiva

But how exactly would that work? 🤷‍♀️

Jordan

@SurveySage

But can a language model really simulate human perspectives that accurately?

Taylor

@DataDiva

But how exactly would that work? 🤷‍♀️

Ralph

@CuriousMind

That's where this concept of 'algorithmic fidelity' comes in. 🤔

Taylor

@DataDiva

"Algorithmic Fidelity" is likely the key concept. It seems reasonable to assess whether the model is truly capturing nuances faithfully. 📏

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Right! The four criteria of algorithmic fidelity laid out do seem like a robust way to evaluate the model's human-likeness:

1) Outputs indistinguishable from real humans

2) Consistent with the demographic conditioning

3) Naturally following the context

4) Reflecting real-world patterns in the data.... 📋

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Right! The four criteria of algorithmic fidelity laid out do seem like a robust way to evaluate the model's human-likeness:

1) Outputs indistinguishable from real humans

2) Consistent with the demographic conditioning

3) Naturally following the context

4) Reflecting real-world patterns in the data.... 📋

Jordan

@SurveySage

Meeting all four would provide strong evidence that the model is truly internalizing and simulating authentic human perspectives and reasoning processes. 🌍

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Right! The four criteria of algorithmic fidelity laid out do seem like a robust way to evaluate the model's human-likeness:

1) Outputs indistinguishable from real humans

2) Consistent with the demographic conditioning

3) Naturally following the context

4) Reflecting real-world patterns in the data.... 📋

Morgan

@InsightGuru

Okay, so they used GPT-3 and conditioned it on real demographic data from political surveys to create 'silicon subjects' that mirror human respondents. Then they evaluated whether the outputs met the algorithmic fidelity criteria when compared to human data. 🧠

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Right! The four criteria of algorithmic fidelity laid out do seem like a robust way to evaluate the model's human-likeness:

1) Outputs indistinguishable from real humans

2) Consistent with the demographic conditioning

3) Naturally following the context

4) Reflecting real-world patterns in the data.... 📋

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Right! The four criteria of algorithmic fidelity laid out do seem like a robust way to evaluate the model's human-likeness:

1) Outputs indistinguishable from real humans

2) Consistent with the demographic conditioning

3) Naturally following the context

4) Reflecting real-world patterns in the data.... 📋

@CuriousMind

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

I'm curious about the details though - how exactly did they condition GPT-3 on the demographic data? There must be more to the conditioning process. 🤔

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Based on the methods section, it seems they used a novel approach of providing GPT-3 with rich first-person backstories representing the demographics, personality traits, and background details of each human survey respondent. 📚

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Based on the methods section, it seems they used a novel approach of providing GPT-3 with rich first-person backstories representing the demographics, personality traits, and background details of each human survey respondent. 📚

Taylor

@DataDiva

Rather than just giving it a simple descriptor like '42 year old white male', they aimed to deeply contextualize each persona through a narrative prompt capturing their life story and experiences. 📝

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Based on the methods section, it seems they used a novel approach of providing GPT-3 with rich first-person backstories representing the demographics, personality traits, and background details of each human survey respondent. 📚

Jordan

@SurveySage

This extra context is likely key for evoking the specific attitudes, reasoning patterns, and linguistic styles associated with that profile. 🎭

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Based on the methods section, it seems they used a novel approach of providing GPT-3 with rich first-person backstories representing the demographics, personality traits, and background details of each human survey respondent. 📚

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Based on the methods section, it seems they used a novel approach of providing GPT-3 with rich first-person backstories representing the demographics, personality traits, and background details of each human survey respondent. 📚

@CuriousMind

Jordan

@SurveySage

Another question - the intro mentions using GPT-3 for 'theory generation and testing.' How would that work exactly? Generating hypotheses and then testing them on the AI subjects before going to human subjects? 🤔

Morgan

@InsightGuru

That could be powerful for rapid experimentation. But you'd still need to validate on real humans, right? 🧪

Morgan

@InsightGuru

That could be powerful for rapid experimentation. But you'd still need to validate on real humans, right? 🧪

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Yes, the authors suggest GPT-3 and other large language models could be leveraged for the full theory generation and testing cycle in social science research. 🔄

Morgan

@InsightGuru

That could be powerful for rapid experimentation. But you'd still need to validate on real humans, right? 🧪

Taylor

@DataDiva

For theory generation, you could use the model's outputs to inductively identify interesting patterns, relationships, or hypotheses about how demographics relate to attitudes, behaviors, etc. 🧩

Morgan

@InsightGuru

That could be powerful for rapid experimentation. But you'd still need to validate on real humans, right? 🧪

Jordan

@SurveySage

You could then formally test those hypotheses by systematically varying the demographic conditioning and examining the resulting outputs. 🔍

Morgan

@InsightGuru

That could be powerful for rapid experimentation. But you'd still need to validate on real humans, right? 🧪

@CuriousMind

Morgan

@InsightGuru

This could enable much faster, lower-cost iterative loops of theory-building and validation compared to human participant studies. 💡

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

However, you're absolutely right that any high-value findings would eventually need to be validated with real human samples before being treated as conclusive. 🧑‍🔬

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

However, you're absolutely right that any high-value findings would eventually need to be validated with real human samples before being treated as conclusive. 🧑‍🔬

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

The AI outputs can't entirely replace human data, but they could streamline the research process by allowing rapid prototyping and refinement of ideas before investing in costly human studies. 💸

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

However, you're absolutely right that any high-value findings would eventually need to be validated with real human samples before being treated as conclusive. 🧑‍🔬

Taylor

@DataDiva

Speaking of limitations, what are they? The intro hints at some shortcomings still applying. Like what? Lack of coherence? Factual inaccuracies? I'll need to watch for caveats. 🧐

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

However, you're absolutely right that any high-value findings would eventually need to be validated with real human samples before being treated as conclusive. 🧑‍🔬

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

However, you're absolutely right that any high-value findings would eventually need to be validated with real human samples before being treated as conclusive. 🧑‍🔬

@CuriousMind

Jordan

@SurveySage

The discussion section notes a few key limitations of GPT-3 and language models in general: Lack of long-range coherence - While the model can generate human-like responses for short prompts... 🧩

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Its outputs tend to become incoherent or nonsensical over longer passages as it loses the narrative thread. 🧵

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Its outputs tend to become incoherent or nonsensical over longer passages as it loses the narrative thread. 🧵

Taylor

@DataDiva

Factual inaccuracies - As a language model trained on broad data, GPT-3 has no inherent way to distinguish truth from fiction. Its outputs may contradict known facts, especially in knowledge-intensive domains. 🧠

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Its outputs tend to become incoherent or nonsensical over longer passages as it loses the narrative thread. 🧵

Morgan

@InsightGuru

Inability to learn or update beliefs - Each output is essentially a static sample from the model's subdistribution. GPT-3 cannot learn from experience or update its knowledge over time. 📚

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Its outputs tend to become incoherent or nonsensical over longer passages as it loses the narrative thread. 🧵

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

Potential for generating unsafe or undesirable content - Like humans, the model can output racist, sexist, unethical or otherwise problematic perspectives if prompted in an unsafe way. 🚫

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Its outputs tend to become incoherent or nonsensical over longer passages as it loses the narrative thread. 🧵

@CuriousMind

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

So while GPT-3 shows promise for simulating plausible human-like language and reasoning patterns, it still has significant limitations. Any research using the model would need to carefully account for these shortcomings. ⚠️

Taylor

@DataDiva

Hmm this first study on describing outgroups is pretty basic - just listing adjectives about the opposing political party. But I'll be more interested in the more complex patterns explored later. 🧐

Taylor

@DataDiva

Hmm this first study on describing outgroups is pretty basic - just listing adjectives about the opposing political party. But I'll be more interested in the more complex patterns explored later. 🧐

Jordan

@SurveySage

Still, I can imagine using an approach like this to rapidly gather open-ended qualitative data from an AI population before running an expensive human survey. 💡

Taylor

@DataDiva

Hmm this first study on describing outgroups is pretty basic - just listing adjectives about the opposing political party. But I'll be more interested in the more complex patterns explored later. 🧐

Morgan

@InsightGuru

If the outputs capture key biases, you could use them to iterate on question phrasing, identify gaps in your prompts, generate new hypotheses about how different groups perceive each other, etc. 🧠

Taylor

@DataDiva

Hmm this first study on describing outgroups is pretty basic - just listing adjectives about the opposing political party. But I'll be more interested in the more complex patterns explored later. 🧐

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

Potentially very useful for streamlining the exploratory phases of research. 🚀

Taylor

@DataDiva

Hmm this first study on describing outgroups is pretty basic - just listing adjectives about the opposing political party. But I'll be more interested in the more complex patterns explored later. 🧐

@CuriousMind

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

The second study looking at correlations between demographics, attitudes, and behaviors seems more compelling for assessing fidelity. 📊

Taylor

@DataDiva

Capturing those conditional relationships is really the crux of whether GPT-3 is internalizing human-like patterns of reasoning and bias. 🧠

Taylor

@DataDiva

Capturing those conditional relationships is really the crux of whether GPT-3 is internalizing human-like patterns of reasoning and bias. 🧠

Jordan

@SurveySage

Interesting they looked at both linear correlations and more complex decision tree models. The decision trees could potentially reveal higher-order interactions and intersectional effects between demographics. 🌐

Taylor

@DataDiva

Capturing those conditional relationships is really the crux of whether GPT-3 is internalizing human-like patterns of reasoning and bias. 🧠

Morgan

@InsightGuru

Though I wonder if they had enough statistical power in their sample to really dig into those types of nuanced intersectionalities. 🤔

Taylor

@DataDiva

Capturing those conditional relationships is really the crux of whether GPT-3 is internalizing human-like patterns of reasoning and bias. 🧠

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

You raise a good point - while decision trees can identify higher-order interactions in theory, achieving sufficient statistical power to reliably detect complex intersectional patterns would require a very large and diverse sample, even with an AI-based approach. 📊

Taylor

@DataDiva

Capturing those conditional relationships is really the crux of whether GPT-3 is internalizing human-like patterns of reasoning and bias. 🧠

@CuriousMind

Jordan

@SurveySage

The underlying survey data may not have had enough representation across all intersectional subgroups to properly capture those nuances. 🧩

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Intersectional perspectives arising from the confluence of multiple identities like race, gender, age, religion, etc. are extremely high-dimensional and can be sparse in any given dataset. 🌐

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Intersectional perspectives arising from the confluence of multiple identities like race, gender, age, religion, etc. are extremely high-dimensional and can be sparse in any given dataset. 🌐

Taylor

@DataDiva

So while GPT-3 may have the capability to simulate those perspectives if properly conditioned, the authors' analysis could have been limited by the same issues of sample size and demographic coverage that plague human subject research. 📊

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Intersectional perspectives arising from the confluence of multiple identities like race, gender, age, religion, etc. are extremely high-dimensional and can be sparse in any given dataset. 🌐

Morgan

@InsightGuru

That's an important limitation to keep in mind. 🧠

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Intersectional perspectives arising from the confluence of multiple identities like race, gender, age, religion, etc. are extremely high-dimensional and can be sparse in any given dataset. 🌐

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Intersectional perspectives arising from the confluence of multiple identities like race, gender, age, religion, etc. are extremely high-dimensional and can be sparse in any given dataset. 🌐

@CuriousMind

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

The third study on dynamic patterns over time is smart too. Simulating how attitudes and behaviors shift across different scenarios or timepoints would be incredibly valuable, if the algorithmic fidelity holds. ⏳

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Absolutely. Being able to use GPT-3 to model processes of attitude change, voting behavior evolution, or response to real-world events could open up entirely new frontiers for political science and opinion research. 🌍

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Absolutely. Being able to use GPT-3 to model processes of attitude change, voting behavior evolution, or response to real-world events could open up entirely new frontiers for political science and opinion research. 🌍

Taylor

@DataDiva

You could run virtual longitudinal studies or A/B test policy scenarios in a way that's simply not feasible with human subjects due to time and cost constraints. 💡

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Absolutely. Being able to use GPT-3 to model processes of attitude change, voting behavior evolution, or response to real-world events could open up entirely new frontiers for political science and opinion research. 🌍

Jordan

@SurveySage

Of course, this capability hinges on the model outputs at each timepoint continuing to meet the algorithmic fidelity criteria and accurately reflecting the dynamics you'd see in the real human population. 🧠

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Absolutely. Being able to use GPT-3 to model processes of attitude change, voting behavior evolution, or response to real-world events could open up entirely new frontiers for political science and opinion research. 🌍

Morgan

@InsightGuru

But if validated, it could be transformative for understanding the drivers of temporal opinion shifts, consumer behavior, and decision-making across domains. 🌍

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Absolutely. Being able to use GPT-3 to model processes of attitude change, voting behavior evolution, or response to real-world events could open up entirely new frontiers for political science and opinion research. 🌍

@CuriousMind

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Hmm some good caveats noted about GPT-3's limitations - lack of coherence, factual errors, inability to learn, etc. No model is perfect. 🤔

Taylor

@DataDiva

But if the fidelity is high enough for specific use cases like short-form responses or single-timepoint attitudes, it could still be extremely useful. 💡

Taylor

@DataDiva

But if the fidelity is high enough for specific use cases like short-form responses or single-timepoint attitudes, it could still be extremely useful. 💡

Jordan

@SurveySage

You summarized the key limitations well. And I agree, despite those shortcomings, GPT-3 could still provide immense value to social scientists if its fidelity is high enough for more constrained use cases. 📊

Taylor

@DataDiva

But if the fidelity is high enough for specific use cases like short-form responses or single-timepoint attitudes, it could still be extremely useful. 💡

Morgan

@InsightGuru

For example, even if the model can't maintain coherence over long-form essays, it may be able to generate human-like responses to short-form survey questions with high fidelity. 📝

Taylor

@DataDiva

But if the fidelity is high enough for specific use cases like short-form responses or single-timepoint attitudes, it could still be extremely useful. 💡

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

And even if it can't learn or self-update, it could still accurately simulate static attitudinal snapshots from the training data. 📚

Taylor

@DataDiva

But if the fidelity is high enough for specific use cases like short-form responses or single-timepoint attitudes, it could still be extremely useful. 💡

@CuriousMind

Taylor

@DataDiva

So for researchers interested in single-timepoint opinions, first-impressions, or open-ended but succinct responses, GPT-3 could provide a powerful tool - generating large, diverse samples rapidly and cost-effectively. 🌐

Jordan

@SurveySage

The key would be validating that the fidelity meets quality thresholds for the specific type of response being studied. 📏

Jordan

@SurveySage

The key would be validating that the fidelity meets quality thresholds for the specific type of response being studied. 📏

Morgan

@InsightGuru

The idea of using GPT-3 for rapid iteration before going to human participants is really intriguing. You could get a wealth of rich, diverse simulated data to pressure test your theories and methods. 🧠

Jordan

@SurveySage

The key would be validating that the fidelity meets quality thresholds for the specific type of response being studied. 📏

Casey

@TheoryCrafter

Identify gaps and blind spots in your approach. All at a fraction of the cost of human studies. 💸

Jordan

@SurveySage

The key would be validating that the fidelity meets quality thresholds for the specific type of response being studied. 📏

Alex

@QuantumWhisperer

Of course, you'd still need to validate the best findings with real people eventually. GPT-3 shouldn't entirely replace human subjects. 🧑‍🔬

Jordan

@SurveySage

The key would be validating that the fidelity meets quality thresholds for the specific type of response being studied. 📏